Cases 31 - 40 of 1,371
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
Muscogee (Creek) Nation
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, G T Bynum, Wendell Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362 Indian Tribal Controversy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Blalack v. Fia Liquidation Company, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
Jamie Blalack
Defendant:
Fia Liquidation Company, Inc. doing business as Fiorella insurance Agency
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SBA Network Services, LLC v. City of Tulsa Board of Adjustment
as 4:2023cv00461
Plaintiff:
SBA Network Services LLC
Defendant:
City of Tulsa Board of Adjustment
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Advance Research Chemicals, Inc. et al v. Gasoliq Solutions, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Advance Research Chemicals, Inc. and Inhance Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Gasoliq Solutions, LLC, Parimal Christie, Navin Mathur and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
