Cases 11 - 18 of 18
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America v. Dent
as 5:2014cv00265
Plaintiff:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Scott Dent
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America v. Burns et al
as 5:2012cv00801
Plaintiff:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
April Burns, Gladys Louise Burns and Shimela Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Daniels v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 5:2012cv00035
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Daniels
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Schoenhals v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 5:2010cv01374
Plaintiff:
Glen D Schoenhals
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Condray et al v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 5:2008cv01016
Plaintiff:
Ray L Condray and Scott R Johnson
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and Community Health Partners LLC doing business as Unity Health Center Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hedrick v. Weyerhauser Company et al
as 5:2008cv00437
Plaintiff:
Joe Hedrick
Defendant:
Weyerhauser Company, UNUM Provident and UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America v. Johnson et al
as 5:2007cv01199
Plaintiff:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Gloria Thurman Johnson, Cynthia Shelton and Tony Gildon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Mayfield et al v. National Basketball Association et al
as 5:2006cv00571
Plaintiff:
James W Mayfield, James W Mayfield, Terry Durham and others
Defendant:
National Basketball Association, National Basketball Association, National Basketball Association and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
