Miller Act Cases filed in the US District Court for the District of Utah Before Judge Clark Waddoups
Dan Fitzgerald Excavating v. Nickle et al
as 2:2016cv00446
Plaintiff: Dan Fitzgerald Excavating
Defendant: Justin Nickle and Old Republic Surety Company
Cross_claimant: Old Republic Surety Company
Cross_defendant: Justin Nickle
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0270
Type: Contract Miller Act
FAS Systems Group v. Balfour Beatty/DPR/Big-D et al
as 2:2015cv00545
Plaintiff: FAS Systems Group
Defendant: Balfour Beatty/DPR/Big-D, Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America, Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
Midgley Huber v. Yeagle & Sons Construction et al
as 2:2015cv00207
Plaintiff: Midgley Huber
Defendant: Yeagle & Sons Construction, Great American Insurance Company and South Mountain Advanced Solutions
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
Automated Structures v. Mike Barnett Construction et al
as 1:2013cv00037
Plaintiff: Automated Structures
Defendant: Mike Barnett Construction and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Developers Surety and Indemnity v. Pacific West et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00188
Plaintiff: Developers Surety and Indemnity and Developers Surety and Indemnity
Defendant: Pacific West, Jay Harwood and S. Val Staker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract Miller Act
R & B Plumbing v. Raass Brothers et al
as 2:2009cv00880
Plaintiff: R & B Plumbing and R & B Plumbing
Defendant: Raass Brothers and Developers Surety and Imdemnity
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0270 Miller Act
Type: Contract None
Tru Crushing v. Ram Constructors et al
as 2:2009cv00789
Plaintiff: Tru Crushing and Tru Crushing
Defendant: Ram Constructors and Western Surety
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?