Cases 1 - 10 of 63
McDowell, Titus v. Seventh Ave, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Titus McDowell
Defendant:
Seventh Ave, Inc. and John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Riemenapp, Alex v. Allstate Insurance Company et al
as 3:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
Alex Riemenapp
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kendall Hunt Publishing Company v. Doe, John
as 3:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Kendall Hunt Publishing Company
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Lac Courte Oreilles Financial Services, LLC et al v. Cane Bay Partners VI, LLLP et al
as 3:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Lac Courte Oreilles Financial Services, LLC, Hummingbird Funds, LLC and Miinan Funds, LLC
Defendant:
Cane Bay Partners VI, LLLP, Dimension Credit (Cayman), L.P., Strategic Link Consulting, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lim, Khor v. Tong, Goh et al
as 3:2021cv00781
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Goh Chok Tong, Barack Obama, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00889
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00833
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
