Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Barttelt, Kevin v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv00727
Plaintiff:
Kevin Barttelt
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Petrusky, Kelly v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv00728
Plaintiff:
Kelly Petrusky
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant, Thomas et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00593
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bryant and State of Wisconsin - Department of Health Services
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation and Group Health Cooperative of Eau Claire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stevens, Amy v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00063
Plaintiff:
Amy Marie Stevens
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill-Rom Services, Inc. et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv00251
Plaintiff:
Hill-Rom Services, Inc., Hill-Rom Company, Inc. and Hill-Rom Manufacturing, Inc.
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation doing business as Stryker Medical and Stryker Sales Corporation
Counter Claimant:
Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Loucks, Kenneth v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00671
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Loucks
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00612
Plaintiff:
Emily M. Thompson , Sara M. Thompson and Scot G. Thompson
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cloute, Joseph v. I-Flow Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00578
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Cloute
Defendant:
I-Flow Corporation, DJO, LLC, DJO Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carroll v. Stryker Corporation
as 3:2009cv00029
Plaintiff:
Matthew Carroll
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
