Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Crutcher et al v. Multiplan, Inc. et al
as 8:2017mc00087
Plaintiff:
Kris Crutcher and Tri-Lakes Diagnostic
Defendant:
Multiplan, Inc. and Private Healthcare Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Multiplan, Inc. et al v. Holland et al
as 8:2017mc00086
Plaintiff:
Multiplan, Inc. and Private Healthcare Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Steven W. Holland and Kevin Barrett
Movant:
Coventry Health Care Workers Compensation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Multiplan, Inc. et al v. Holland
as 8:2017mc00085
Plaintiff:
Multiplan, Inc. and Private Healthcare Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Steven W. Holland
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Masse v. Medical Services of Chattanooga, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01137
Plaintiff:
Michael Masse
Defendant:
Medical Services of Chattanooga, Inc. and Florida Hospital Healthcare System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Pierson v. Orlando Regional Healthcare Systems, Inc. et al
as 6:2008cv00466
Not Yet Classified:
SunTrust Bank
Defendant:
N. Donald Diebel, Florida Health Department, Steven Appleblatt and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Joanne R. Werntz
Plaintiff:
Raymond H. Pierson, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Zoher v. NHC Healthcare System, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00086
Plaintiff:
Mina G. Zoher, M.D.
Defendant:
NHC Healthcare System, Inc. and Naples Community Hospital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pierson v. Orlando Regional Healthcare Systems, Inc. et al
as 8:2008cv00183
Plaintiff:
Raymond H. Pierson, III, Raymond H. Pierson, III, Raymond H. Pierson, III and others
Defendant:
Orlando Regional Healthcare Systems, Inc., Phillip G. Spiegel, Roger Murbach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2007cv61926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
