Cases 1 - 4 of 4
National Stabilization Agreement of the Sheet Metal Industry Trust Fund et al v. Affordable Comfort Construction/HVAC, Inc.
as 1:2013cv04354
Plaintiff:
National Stabilization Agreement of the Sheet Metal Industry Trust Fund , Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund , International Training Institute for the Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Industry and others
Defendant:
Affordable Comfort Construction/HVAC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Board of Trustees, National Stabilization Agreement of the Sheet Metal Industry Trust Fund v. Affordable Comfort Construction/HVAC, Inc.
as 1:2013cv03040
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees, National Stabilization Agreement of the Sheet Metal Industry Trust Fund, Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund, Board of Trustees, International Training Institute for the Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Industry and others
Defendant:
Affordable Comfort Construction/HVAC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
The National Stabilization Agreement of the Sheet Metal Industry Trust Fund et al v. HBC Mechanical, Inc.
as 1:2011cv03080
Plaintiff:
The National Stabilization Agreement of the Sheet Metal Industry Trust Fund , Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund , International Training Institute for the Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Industry and others
Defendant:
HBC Mechanical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund et al v. Green Mechanical, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01415
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund, International Training Institute for the Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Industry, National Energy Management Institute Committee and others
Defendant:
Green Mechanical, Inc. and Caroline Green
Garnishee:
Libertyville Bank & Trust Co.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
