Cases 1 - 7 of 7
BEAUMONT v. VANGUARD LOGISTICS SERVICES (USA), INC. et al
as 1:2022cv06235
Plaintiff:
GARY BEAUMONT
Defendant:
Vanguard Logistics Services (USA), Inc., Police Officers John Does 1-10 and ABC COMPANIES 1-10 (FICTITIOUS NAMES)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Admiral Container Lines of Malta v. USD 253,120, in rem, held by J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 383 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10179 et al
as 1:2021cv11069
Plaintiff:
Admiral Container Lines of Malta
Defendant:
XYZ Corporation, John Does 1-100 and USD 253,120, in rem, held by J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 383 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10179
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 ad Admiralty
MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. v. Baltic Auto Shipping, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv07660
Plaintiff:
MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.
Defendant:
Baltic Auto Shipping, Inc., Trips Logistics Corp., Fathi Mohamed Abdusalam Aldukali and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30304
Thorco Projects A/S v. Smccall International, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv03434
Plaintiff:
Thorco Projects A/S
Defendant:
Smccall International, LLC, Shanai L McCall and John Doe 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Austral Asia Line Pte. Ltd. v. Chuu et al
as 1:2016cv05378
Plaintiff:
Austral Asia Line Pte. Ltd.
Defendant:
Justin Chuu, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Global Auto, Inc. et al v. Hitrinov et al
as 1:2013cv02479
Plaintiff:
Effect Auto Sales, Inc., G Auto Sales, Inc. and Global Auto, Inc.
Defendant:
Empire United Lines Co., Inc., Michael Hitrinov, John Does 1 through 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Carribbean Retail Ventures, Inc. v. M/V Zim Haifa et al
as 1:2007cv06873
Plaintiff:
Carribbean Retail Ventures, Inc.
Defendant-in-Rem:
M/V Zim Haifa
Defendant:
Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., Koron Maritime, Inc., Belco Resources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
