Cases 1 - 10 of 67
BAPTIST HEALTH SOUTH FLORIDA, INC et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01366
Plaintiff:
ASCENSION VIA CHRISTI HOSPITAL MANHATTAN INC, ASCENSION VIA CHRISTI HOSPITAL PITTSBURG, INC., ASCENSION VIA CHRISTI HOSPITALS WICHITA INC and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01309
Plaintiff:
Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Western Reserve Hospital, LLC, Christus St. Frances Cabrini Hospital and others
Petitioner:
Memorial Medical Center
Defendant:
Secretary Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
ACADIA GENERAL HOSPITAL, INC et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00936
Plaintiff:
ACADIA GENERAL HOSPITAL, INC doing business as OCHSNER ACADIA GENERAL HOSPITAL, ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as ABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL, ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as BUFFALO HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
AHS HILLCREST MEDICAL CENTER, LLC et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
AHS HILLCREST MEDICAL CENTER, LLC d/b/a Hillcrest Medical Center doing business as HILLCREST MEDICAL CENTER, HONORHEALTH DEER VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, HONORHEALTH JOHN C. LINCOLN MEDICAL CENTER doing business as SCOTTSDALE LINCOLN HEALTH NETWORK doing business as JOHN C. LINCOLN HOSPITAL-NORTH MOUNTAIN doing business as JOHN C. LINCOLN NORTH MOUNTAIN HOSPITAL doing business as SCOTTSDALE HEALTHCARE and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
GALEN HOSPITAL ALASKA, INC. et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
GALEN HOSPITAL ALASKA, INC. doing business as ALASKA REGIONAL HOSPITAL, RIVERSIDE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. doing business as RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. doing business as REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
ST. MARYS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al v. XAVIER BECERRA
as 1:2023cv01594
Plaintiff:
ST. MARYS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, NORTH ALABAMA MEDICAL CENTER fka ELIZA COFFEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, ANDALUSIA HEALTH fka COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF ANDALUSIA and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary United States Department of Health and Human Services and XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
GALEN HOSPITAL ALASKA, INC. et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv03085
Plaintiff:
GALEN HOSPITAL ALASKA, INC. doing business as ALASKA REGIONAL HOSPITAL, RIVERSIDE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. doing business as RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. doing business as REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
GALEN HOSPITAL ALASKA, INC. et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv02904
Plaintiff:
GALEN HOSPITAL ALASKA, INC. doing business as ALASKA REGIONAL HOSPITAL, RIVERSIDE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. doing business as RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. doing business as REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
CHENANGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv01712
Plaintiff:
CHENANGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC. and CHENANGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
Not Classified By Court:
XAVIER BACERRA
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
BEAVERCREEK MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv02521
Plaintiff:
BEAVERCREEK MEDICAL CENTER doing business as INDU & RAJ SOIN MEDICAL CENTER, DAYTON OSTEOPATHIC HOSPITAL doing business as GRANDVIEW MEDICAL CENTER, GREENE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC. and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
