Cases 1 - 8 of 8
SLINGERLAND v. ANGRICK, III et al
as 1:2016cv01725
Plaintiff:
HAROLD SLINGERLAND
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. ANGRICK , III , PHILLIP A. CLOUGH , GEORGE H. ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 078
BILLARD v. ANGRICK et al
as 1:2016cv01612
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BILLARD
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. ANGRICK , III , PHILLIP A. CLOUGH , GEORGE H. ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
CAMPBELL v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. (AIG) et al
as 1:2012cv00115
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN LYNN CAMPBELL
Defendant:
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. (AIG), R. H. BENMOSCHE, W. D. CORNWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
TREPPEL v. REASON et al
as 1:2010cv01641
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE TREPPEL
Defendant:
J. PAUL REASON, CHARLES W. WOORMAN, IV, DAVID R. GOODE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAWAII ANNUITY TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS v. HILLS et al
as 1:2008cv00081
Plaintiff:
HAWAII ANNUITY TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS, HAWAII ANNUITY TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS, HAWAII ANNUITY TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS and others
Defendant:
RODERICK M. HILLS, FERNANDO AGUIRRE, MORTEN ARNTZEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL #218 (S) PENSION FUND v. HILLS et al
as 1:2007cv01957
Plaintiff:
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL #218 (S) PENSION FUND
Defendant:
RODERICK M. HILLS, FERNANDO AGUIRRE, MORTEN ARNTZEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
MIDDLETON v. RAINES et al
as 1:2007cv01221
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR MIDDLETON
Defendant:
FRANKLIN D. RAINES, J. TIMOTHY HOWARD, DANIEL H. MUDD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 j(b) Stockholder Suit
KELLMER v. RAINES et al
as 1:2007cv01173
Plaintiff:
JAMES KELLMER
Defendant:
FRANKLIN D. RAINES, J. TIMOTHY HOWARD, LEANNE SPENCER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 j(b) Stockholder Suit
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
