Cases 1 - 9 of 9
IKEA Supply AG v. Convoy, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
IKEA Supply AG
Defendant:
Convoy, Inc., HERCULES CAPITAL, INC., AMERICAN TRANSPORTERS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
U-Haul Co. of Arizona v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
U-Haul Co. of Arizona
Defendant:
Jonathan O. Davis, Meraysha Boler, Elise R. Pruckler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Smart et al v. Amcore Investment Group et al
as 3:2022cv50211
Plaintiff:
Edtwon Smart and Rodney Love
Defendant:
Amcore Investment Group, Kevin J. Frost and Justen Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Love El v. Brown
as 1:2018cv02881
Plaintiff:
Moalt D. Love El
Defendant:
Donald P. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johns Plumbing, Inc. v. Shudy et al
as 1:2017cv02529
Plaintiff:
Johns Plumbing Inc
Defendant:
Michael Shudy and Fettes Love & Sieben, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Love Freightways, Inc. et al v. Navistar, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00253
Plaintiff:
Love Freightways, Inc. and JTM Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
Navistar, Inc. and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
-BGC Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc v. Oakview Construction Inc
as 1:2010cv01384
Plaintiff:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
Defendant:
Oakview Construction Inc
Thirdparty_defendant:
Rowe Construction Co and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Oakview Construction Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pacific Indemnity Company v. R.H. Love Galleries, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00454
Plaintiff:
Pacific Indemnity Company and Pacific Indemnity Company
Defendant:
R.H. Love Galleries, Inc., Richard H. Love and E. Geraldine Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Love v. Constautiue
as 1:2009cv06499
Plaintiff:
Quentin Love
Defendant:
Ed Constautiue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
