Cases 1 - 10 of 17
ADAMS v. NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
as 1:2024cv21102
Plaintiff:
DARRIN ADAMS
Defendant:
NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Adams v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2022cv21180
Plaintiff:
Patricia Adams
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ADAMS v. NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.,
as 1:2020cv22900
Plaintiff:
CHERYL ADAMS
Defendant:
NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In the Matter of the Complaint of Adam J. Petnuch and Reel Dreams Fishing Charters
as 3:2020cv00497
Petitioner:
ADAM J. PETNUCH AND REEL DREAMS FISHING CHARTERS, AS OWNER AND OWNER PRO HAC VICE OF A 1995 30' GRADY WHITE (HIN: NTLEA103F495),, Adam J. Petnuch and Reel Dreams Fishing Charters
Claimant:
Unknown Claimants, Debra DeMaria and Joseph DeMaria
In Re:
In the Matter of the Complaint of Adam J. Petnuch and Reel Dreams Fishing Charters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adams v. NCL (Bahamas) LTD.
as 1:2020cv20438
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe (C.A.) and Corinne Adams
Defendant:
NCL (Bahamas) LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Adams v. Carnival Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv24578
Defendant:
Rainforest Adventures (Holdings) Ltd., Elite Shore Excursions Ltd., Elite Shore Excursions Foundation and others
Plaintiff:
Laurence Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Slupczynski v. Topmiller
as 6:2018cv02157
Defendant:
James Topmiller
Plaintiff:
Adam Slupczynski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Adams v. CARNIVAL CORPORATION
as 1:2018cv23902
Defendant:
CARNIVAL CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
Calvin Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Carnival Corporation,
as 1:2016cv22358
Plaintiff:
Linda Adams
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHEPAUM v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2015cv24374
Plaintiff:
ADAM SHEPAUM
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
