Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Reichal v. Bevzyuk et al
as 7:2017cv05567
Plaintiff:
William L. Reichal
Defendant:
Dimitry V. Bevzyuk and Olga Bevzyuk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Yakubovich v. Park et al
as 1:2017cv04322
Defendant:
Cowan Equipment Leasing, LLC and Clyde V. Park
Plaintiff:
Denis Yakubovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
He et al v. Shi et al
as 1:2017cv02512
Defendant:
Americhina Intro, Inc., Lin Hou, Yang Qiu and others
Plaintiff:
Meiying Bai, Fumin He, Yunzhong Lan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Park v. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2017cv02404
Plaintiff:
Byung K Park
Defendant:
Eddie V Rodriguez and Transfer Trailor Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Shpontak et al v. Etlis et al
as 1:2017cv02237
Defendant:
Tobin L Etlis and Toyota Lease Trust
Plaintiff:
K. S., V. S., Alla Shpontak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Alvarez et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives et al
as 1:2016cv00423
Plaintiff:
Miguelina Alvarez and Carmen Castillo
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives, Doe Corporation 1-5, John Doe 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Matos v. Autobus Bell Horizon, Inc. et al
as 7:2015cv08218
Plaintiff:
Kevin V. Matos
Defendant:
Autobus Bell Horizon, Inc. and Denis Perron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fields et al v. Henry V. Rabouin, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02356
Plaintiff:
Walter Fields and Jennie Fields
Defendant:
Henry V. Rabouin, Inc. and William Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Couch v. Ramos et al
as 1:2014cv07342
Plaintiff:
Bernard A. Couch
Defendant:
Mervin V. Ramos and Ryder Truck Rental, LT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthew v. FedEx Freight, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03792
Plaintiff:
Cox Matthew
Defendant:
FedEx Freight, Inc. and Ivan V. Carhuayo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
