Cases 11 - 20 of 2,994
Page v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01658
Plaintiff:
Verdette Page
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. and Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BURRIS v. Albertson's LLC
as 2:2024cv01651
Plaintiff:
WALLACE BURRIS
Defendant:
Albertson's LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Burke v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01617
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
William Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Gibson v. Kingdom Trust
as 2:2024cv01619
Defendant:
Kingdom Trust
Plaintiff:
Nathan Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rosas-Jara v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01620
Plaintiff:
Norma Rosas-Jara
Defendant:
Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carter et al v. Treasure Island LV LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01631
Plaintiff:
Gary D Carter and Kimberly Alexander
Defendant:
Unknown Ramirez, Treasure Island LV LLC and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hernandez v. Cardenas Markets, LLC
as 2:2024cv01597
Plaintiff:
Brizza Hernandez
Defendant:
Cardenas Markets, LLC doing business as Cardenas Markets
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Espinosa v. Cargo Jet Carriers, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Yoanis Gonzalez Espinosa
Defendant:
Cargo Jet Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Pacheco v. Walmart Inc
as 2:2024cv01551
Defendant:
WALMART INC
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Renee Pacheco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Harper v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 2:2024cv01536
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Plaintiff:
Whitney Carol Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
