Cases 21 - 30 of 152
Doe v. Solebury School et al
as 1:2021cv06792
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Solebury School, John Ward Regan and John & Jane Smith 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t
Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2021cv03710
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Plaintiff:
Daneil Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Smith v. City of North Tonawanda
as 1:2021cv00530
Defendant:
City of North Tonawanda
Plaintiff:
Shaulene Novelette Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mahmoud v. Akima Global Sevices LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00013
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe Physicians, Akima Global Services, LLC, Detention Center Officer Captain Vohwinkel and others
Plaintiff:
Munther Mahmoud
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Smith v. Interstate Management Company LLC et al
as 1:2020cv10867
Defendant:
Sean Leong, Interstate Hotels & Resorts Inc., Interstate Management Company LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t
Smith v. Bosley Hair Restoration
as 1:2020cv08489
Defendant:
Bosley Hair Restoration
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Behar v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
as 1:2020cv06300
Plaintiff:
MARTIN BEHAR
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
Petitioner:
John C. Nelson, Midori T. Nelson, Howard Katz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. United State of America
as 1:2020cv06068
Defendant:
United State of America
Plaintiff:
Rowdella Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 pi
Smith v. Ecolabs Inc.
as 1:2020cv03453
Plaintiff:
Andrew Smith
Defendant:
Ecolabs Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Bozin et al v. Deloitte Consulting LLP
as 1:2020cv05070
Defendant:
Deloitte Consulting LLP
Plaintiff:
Nicole Hornbeck, Alexandria Polichena, Bernadette Nolen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
