Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MORRIS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv01941
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. MORRIS, JESSE URENA, BRIANNE CROOKS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
DAVIS et al v. MTN GROUP LIMITED et al
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
GUY L DAVIS, TERESITA R DAVIS, AYLA M DAVIS and others
Defendant:
MTN GROUP LIMITED, MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY, PHUTHUMA NHLEKO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
DONALDSON et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2017cv01206
Plaintiff:
JAMES DONALDSON , PEGGY DONALDSON , ADRIAN BUTLER and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
MORRIS v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2015cv01646
Plaintiff:
CHARLES VINCENT MORRIS
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LEEMAN et al v. NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE et al
as 1:2013cv01856
Plaintiff:
GARY LEEMAN , BRADLEY AITKEN , DARREN BANKS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE and NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE BOARD OF GOVERNORS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRIS v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
as 1:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE MORRIS
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
HARRISON et al v. REPUBLIC OF SUDAN
as 1:2010cv01689
Plaintiff:
RICK HARRISON , JOHN BUCKLEY , MARGARET LOPEZ and others
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF SUDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
KISSI v. MORRIS et al
as 1:2009cv01756
Plaintiff:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant:
MILTON MORRIS, STANDARD OFFICE SUPPLY and MDM OFFICE SYSTEMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
MCKEEMAN v. HORBALY
as 1:2009cv00926
Plaintiff:
RITA MORRIS MCKEEMAN
Defendant:
JAN HORBALY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
