Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Davis et al v. Ethicon et al
as 1:2012cv00143
Plaintiff:
Terri Davis and Daniel Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Batis et al v. Ethicon et al
as 1:2012cv00138
Plaintiff:
Georgeann Batis and John Steven Batis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taggart v. Ethicon et al
as 1:2012cv00144
Plaintiff:
Stephanie D. Taggart
Defendant:
Ethicon, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
West v. Ethicon et al
as 2:2012cv00642
Plaintiff:
Susan D. West
Defendant:
Ethicon, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thornwall v. Ethicon et al
as 2:2012cv00638
Plaintiff:
Lorna G. Thornwall
Defendant:
Ethicon, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Singleton v. DePuy Orthopaedics et al
as 1:2012cv00028
Plaintiff:
Janette Singleton
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, DePuy, Johnson & Johnson International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. DePuy Orthopaedics et al
as 2:2012cv00186
Plaintiff:
Mary Joy Wright
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, DePuy, Johnson & Johnson International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. DePuy Orthopaedics et al
as 1:2012cv00027
Plaintiff:
Gayle Bell
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, DePuy, Johnson & Johnson International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brimley v. SC Phippen Medical et al
as 2:2011cv01142
Plaintiff:
Leann C. Brimley
Defendant:
SC Phippen Medical , Steven C. Phippen , DePuy Orthopaedics and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Potter v. DePuy Orthopaedics et al
as 2:2011cv01068
Plaintiff:
Jack R. Potter
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, DePuy, Johnson & Johnson International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
