Cases 31 - 40 of 133
Hillsman v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 0:2013cv61886
Plaintiff:
Valvery Hillsman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Platten v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01031
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ann Platten
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tillman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00222
Plaintiff:
Lessie Tillman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ward et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00097
Plaintiff:
Kent H. Ward and Denise Ward
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Mikalinis-Aissam et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 8:2012cv02410
Plaintiff:
Yudesy R. Mikalinis-Aissam and Karim Aissam
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shapiro v. Davol, Inc., et al
as 3:2012cv01090
Plaintiff:
Harry Shapiro and Ragen Shapiro
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Regan et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv14357
Plaintiff:
James Regan and Jimmie Regan
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Avin-King et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv61969
Plaintiff:
Sheila A. Avin-King and Kenneth E. King
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
O'Connor v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv01491
Plaintiff:
Prudence O'Connor
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Santiago v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 9:2012cv81005
Plaintiff:
Albert Santiago
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
