Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Mallah v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
as 1:2023cv09892
Plaintiff:
Fatme Mallah
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. (f/k/a Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc.) and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Woolbright et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
as 1:2023cv02417
Plaintiff:
Ashleigh Woolbright and A. W.
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. (f/k/a Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc.) and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
McDanel et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02209
Plaintiff:
Mark McDanel and Michele McDanel
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. (f/k/a Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc.), CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walmart, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Wood et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02010
Plaintiff:
Israel Wood and LYANA WOOD
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., f/k/a JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walgreens Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01014
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Rodriguez and Ann Rodriguez
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. (f/k/a Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc.), CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Graham v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2020cv08876
Defendant:
Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc., THE PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY, individually and as successor in interest to YARDLEY OF LONDON, INC., LAURA MERCIER COSMETICS and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
