Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jones et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00116
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular
Plaintiff:
Matthew Richard Jones and Ashlee Marie Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. Wright Medical Technology et al
as 2:2021cv00079
Plaintiff:
Richard Dixon
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology and Wright Medical Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Fuit et al v. Solo Sports Group et al
as 1:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
Richard Fuit and Kimberly Fuit
Defendant:
Solo Sports Group, Extreme Products Group, Mauro Bove and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kalles v. Sundlie et al
as 2:2014cv00381
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Kalles
Defendant:
Pamela Sundlie and Ellis Sundlie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miros v. Cargotec USA
as 1:2010cv00025
Plaintiff:
Richard Miros
Defendant:
Cargotec USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
St. John v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00834
Plaintiff:
Richard St. John and Richard St. John
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development and McNeil-PPC Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Farr v. Wyeth Inc
as 2:2009cv00692
Plaintiff:
Richard Farr
Defendant:
Wyeth Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Warner et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv00624
Plaintiff:
Scott Warner, Scott Warner, Scott Warner and others
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation, I Flow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tullis v. Bayer et al
as 2:2009cv00082
Plaintiff:
Richard Tullis
Defendant:
Bayer, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Bayer Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hamilton et al v. Merck & Co
as 1:2008cv00136
Plaintiff:
Lou Jeanne Hamilton and Richard Hamilton
Defendant:
Merck & Co
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
