Cases 51 - 60 of 91
Mines et al v. A. O. Smith Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00793
Plaintiff:
Ulysses G. Mines, Jr. and Florence Mines
Defendant:
A. O. Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Honeywell International Inc. , A. O. Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rose et al v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00707
Plaintiff:
David Rose and Freda Rose
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Optical Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Honeywell International Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bishop v. BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00673
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Bishop
Defendant:
BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. , Clayton Industries, Cleaver-Brooks Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Honeywell International Inc. , BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., Clayton Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Baldwin v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01986
Plaintiff:
Paula Baldwin
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Bird Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Oakfabco Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Oakfabco Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dougherty et al v. A O Smith Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01972
Plaintiff:
Francis J. Dougherty and Elizabeth F. Dougherty
Defendant:
A O Smith Corporation, Armstrong International Inc., Bell & Gossett Pump Company and others
Cross_claimant:
John Crane Inc.
Cross_defendant:
A O Smith Corporation, Armstrong International Inc., Bell & Gossett Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Tallman v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv01828
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Tallman
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Genuine Parts Company , IMO Industries Inc. , SB Decking Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Genuine Parts Company , 84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Shaffer v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2013cv01113
Plaintiff:
Dottie Ann Shaffer
Defendant:
3M Company, American Standard Inc., Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Borg-Warner Corporation , Eaton Corporation, General Electric Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Borg-Warner Corporation , 3M Company, American Standard Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
White et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2013cv01085
Plaintiff:
Cynthia White , Rose White and Jimmy George White
Defendant:
3M Company, Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
General Electric Company and Honeywell International Inc.
Cross_defendant:
General Electric Company , 3M Company, CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Allen et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv01014
Plaintiff:
Jerry Allen and Lou Ann Allen
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation, Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00831
Plaintiff:
Marguerite MacQueen
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing , Aerco International Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
General Electric Company, IMO Industries Inc. and Hyde Windlass Company
Cross_defendant:
General Electric Company , 3M Company, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
