Cases 51 - 60 of 200
Penny et al v. AT&T Corporation et al
as 0:2014cv62838
Plaintiff:
Kris Penny and Lori McNamara
Defendant:
AT&T Corporation , Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc , Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rothchild et al v. Crane Co et al
as 9:2014cv80271
Plaintiff:
Herbert Rothchild and Audrey Rothchild
Defendant:
Crane Co. , Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation , Owens-Illinois, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bean et al v. Pneumo Abex LLC
as 0:2014cv60207
Plaintiff:
Carol A. Bean and EUGENE P BEAN
Defendant:
Pneumo Abex LLC , Ford Motor Company , Borg-Warner Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hubert v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv00114
Plaintiff:
Janelle Hubert
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare AG, Bayer Pharma AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peruyero et al v. Airbus S.A.S. et al
as 1:2013cv22831
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Peruyero et al v. Airbus S.A.S. et al
as 1:2013cv22832
Plaintiff:
Orlando Peruyero
Defendant:
Airbus S.A.S., BAE Systems Holdings, Inc., BAE Systems PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Oneal v. Crane Co. et al
as 0:2013cv61510
Defendant:
Crane Co. , Alfa Laval, Inc , Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
James A. Oneal and Linda Oneal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Oneal v. Crane Co. et al
as 0:2013cv61507
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
v. Crane Co.
as 0:2013cv61506
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Lazenberry v. NapoliBern, Ripkashkolnik, Associates, LLP
as 3:2013cv00672
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lazenberry
Defendant:
NapoliBern, Ripkashkolnik, Associates, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
