Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Turlington v. USN OPCO, LLC
as 1:2024cv01289
Plaintiff:
Leah Turlington
Defendant:
USN OPCO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Scheeler et al v. Canopy Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02417
Plaintiff:
AGR GROUP LLC, AGR, INC., TOTAL UTILITY CONTRACTING OF MINNESOTA, INC. and others
Counter Defendant:
RYAN SCHEELER
Defendant:
CANOPY HOLDINGS, LLC d/b/a CANOPY HOLDINGS OF COLORADO, LLC, MATT HIRSCHBIEL and Canopy Holdings, LLC a Virginia limited liability company doing business in Colorado doing business as Canopy Holdings of Colorado, LLC
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
CANOPY HOLDINGS OF NEBRASKA, LLC and Canopy Holdings, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
TIMOTHY DAY
Interested Party:
USA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Beckman v. Emergency Service Physicians, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01174
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Beckman
Defendant:
U.S. Acute Care Solutions Holdings, LLC, Emergency Service Physicians, Inc. d/b/a US Acute Care Solutions, Emergency Service Physicians, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Wolff v. Citigroup, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02281
Plaintiff:
Frank Wolff
Defendant:
Citigroup, Inc., Citi Holdings, Citicorp and others
Interested_party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Mobile Barriers LLC v. Gambatese et al
as 1:2014cv02125
Plaintiff:
Mobile Barriers LLC
Defendant:
John (I) A. Gambatese, John A. Gambatese, Nicholas (I) Tymvios and others
Interested_party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Patterson v. Rocky Mountain Gastroenterology Associates, PLLC et al
as 1:2014cv00128
Plaintiff:
Steven L. Patterson
Defendant:
Rocky Mountain Gastroenterology Associates, PLLC, Anesthesia Associates of the Front Range, LLC and Anesthesia Associates of the Rockies, LLC
Interested_party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
