Cases 1 - 10 of 183
Ross v. DuPont De Nemours, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00855
Plaintiff:
Michael James Ross
Defendant:
DuPont De Nemours, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
EL v. Hall EL
as 0:2024cv61398
Defendant:
William Hall EL
Plaintiff:
Sheik S. EL
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Champagne v. Trustbridge, Inc.
as 9:2024cv80603
Plaintiff:
Lorrie Champagne
Defendant:
Trustbridge, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Mulvey v. Fyzical, LLC
as 2:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Dr. Christopher Mulvey
Defendant:
Fyzical, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Carpenter v. KUS Americas, Inc.
as 0:2024cv60430
Plaintiff:
Nerissa Carpenter
Defendant:
KUS Americas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America v. LTJ Group V, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
LTJ Group V, LLC, Innovak of Florida, Inc. and Robert J Remington
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Glowacki v. Lightshare Behavioral Wellness & Recovery, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GLOWACKI
Defendant:
LIGHTSHARE BEHAVIORAL WELLNESS & RECOVERY, INC., and Lightshare Behavioral Wellness & Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Walsh v. Nayar Health Care, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv02313
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Walsh
Defendant:
Nayar Health Care LLC, and Nayar Health Care Melbourne LLC, Nayar Health Care LLC and Nayar Health Care Melbourne LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Trulock v. Nayar Health Care, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv02310
Plaintiff:
TAMMY TRULOCK
Defendant:
Nayar Health Care, LLC and Nayar Health Care Melbourne, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Quince v. Cerebral Medical Group, P.A.
as 2:2023cv14366
Plaintiff:
Crystal Quince
Defendant:
Cerebral Medical Group P.A.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
