Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 273
Barry Donnellan v. Alaska Equipment Rentals, Inc.
as 22-35970
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee: ALASKA EQUIPMENT RENTALS, INC.
Barry Donnellan v. Alascconnect, LLC
as 22-35971
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee: ALASCCONNECT, LLC
Barry Donnellan v. Pike's on the River, Inc.
as 22-35968
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee: PIKE'S ON THE RIVER, INC.
Barry Donnellan v. Design Alaska, Inc.
as 22-35961
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee: DESIGN ALASKA, INC.
Barry Donnellan v. PDC (Consulting Engineers), Inc.
as 22-35959
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee: PDC (CONSULTING ENGINEERS), INC.
Barry Donnellan v. G2 Construction, Inc.
as 22-35960
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee: G2 CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Barry Donnellan v. Fountainhead Development, Inc.
as 22-35956
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee: FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Barry Donnellan v. Sourdough Express, Inc.
as 22-35957
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee: SOURDOUGH EXPRESS, INC.
Barry Donnellan v. Gene's, Inc.
as 22-35954
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee: GENE'S, INC.
Barry Donnellan v. Alaska Riverways, Inc.
as 22-35950
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee: ALASKA RIVERWAYS, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?