Antitrust Cases filed in New York
Cases 31 - 40 of 50
In re Novartis and Par Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv04361
Defendant: Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Drogueria Betances, LLC, H-E-B LP, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc., Turlock Irrigation District and UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund
Respondent: Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Lupin Ltd., Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., OptumRX, Inc. and others
Interested Party: Caremark PHC, LLC and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
B & R Supermarket, Inc., et al v. Visa, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02738
Defendant: Visa Inc., PNC Bank National Association, USAA Savings Bank and others
Interested Party: Elavon, Inc.
Plaintiff: B & R Supermarket, Inc., rue21, Inc., Palero Food Corp. and Cagueyes Food Corp. d/b/a Fine Fare Supermarket and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Stepherson Inc. et al v. Visa USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00718
Plaintiff: Big B's Supermarket, Inc., Breaux Mart Supermarkets, Inc., Champagne Markets, LLC and others
Defendant: Mastercard Incorporated, Mastercard International Incorporated, Visa International Service Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
B & R Supermarket, Inc., et al v. Visa, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv05338
Plaintiff: B & R Supermarket, Inc. and Grove Liquors LLC
Defendant: American Express Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
National Restaurants Management, Inc. et al v. Visa Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06827
Plaintiff: Brown - Thompson General Partnership d/b/a 7-Eleven Stores, Cleveland State University, D & H Company and others
Defendant: Mastercard Incorporated, Mastercard International Incorporated, Visa Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Pit Boss, Inc. et al v. National Football League, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09165
Plaintiff: Pit Boss, Inc. , Draught Inc. , T-3 Restaurants, Inc. and others
Defendant: National Football League, Inc., NFL Enterprises LLC, Arizona Cardinals Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Jon2 LLC d/b/a Mannys on 2nd et al v. National Football League, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06692
Plaintiff: Jon2 LLC d/b/a Mannys on 2nd and Adam Matschullat
Defendant: National Football League, Inc., NFL Enterprises, LLC, Directv, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Conway et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2015cv05539
Plaintiff: Jerry L. Conway , Cory Musselman , The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group, LLP and others
Defendant: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc., Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Bass Pro Group, LLC et al v. Visa, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv07540
Plaintiff: 1-800 Contacts, Inc. d/b/a Glasses.com, 1-800 Contacts, Inc. d/b/a South Valley Optical, American Sportsman Holdings Co and others
Defendant: Mastercard Incorporated, Mastercard International Incorporated, Visa Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014md02542
Plaintiff: Yelda Mesbah Bartlett, Bay Valley Foods, LLC, Lavinia Simona Biasell and others
Defendant: Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., f/k/a Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., and as successor to Keurig, and others
Interested Party: JBR, Inc. (d/b/a Rogers Family Company)
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: All Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs
Petitioner: Sagentia, Inc. and Sagentia, Ltd.
Special Master: Hon. Barbara S. Jones
Not Classified By Court: Amazon.Com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?