Cases 1 - 3 of 3
Jon Tate Construction, LLC et al v. Sika Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv03229
Plaintiff:
Jon Tate Construction, LLC and Jon S. Garrett d/b/a Black River Masonry, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Sika Corporation, Sika AG, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
IN RE: CONCRETE AND CEMENT ADDITIVES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2024md03097
Not Yet Classified:
Concrete and Cement Additives Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
SMBA Construction, LLC, Charles W. Hughes Construction, LLC, Lucas Contracting, LLC and others
Defendant:
Chryso, Inc., Cinven Ltd., Cinven, Inc. and others
Other:
US Department of Justice Antitrust Division
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 26 Suit for injunctive relief re violation antitrust laws
In re Foreign Exchange Benchmark Rates Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2013cv07789
Not Classified By Court:
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Keith Kornell, Gregory Galan and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Nasser Bakizada, Robert Charles Class A, L.P., Jeffrey Sterk and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Citibank N.A., Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Credit Suisse Group AP and others
Defendant:
Settling Defendants, Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Donna S. Lucas, Neil Taylor, Doris Sue Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Rives, Robert Miller, Casey Sterk and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
HSBC Bank plc, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., HSBC North America Holdings, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Fresno County Employees Retirement Association
Consolidated Counter Defendant:
BNP Paribas North America, Inc.
Claimant:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD), Forex Capital Markets, LLC, Lucid Markets LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
