Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Mullins v. Novatech et al
as 1:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
Avis Mullins
Defendant:
INC NOVATECH, CYNTHIA PETION, EDDY PETION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Allstate Insurance Co.v. Roland Rose, D.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Co., Allstate Indemnity Company, Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Roland Rose, D.C., Rose Chiropractic Health & Wellness, P.C., Christian Bannerman, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Hollis Novel Comprehensive Medical, P.C. et al
as 1:2020cv06108
Defendant:
Rx For You Corp., Hillcrest Medical Care, P.C., Azu Ajudua, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Allstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company and Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Chumaceiro et al
as 1:2020cv02220
Defendant:
Peter Khaim, LL Consulting Group, Inc., Southern Blvd Chiropractic, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, Government Employees Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Avetisyan et al
as 1:2017cv04275
Defendant:
ABC Corporations, AOM Medical Supply, Inc., AVA Custom Supply Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, Allstate Indemnity Company, Allstate Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GE Money Bank v. Body Solutions of Westbury, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv03935
Plaintiff:
GE Money Bank
Defendant:
Body Solutions of Westbury, LLC, Body Solutions of Manhattan, LLC, Body Solutions Unlimited, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
