Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Yaques et al v. Lin et al
as 1:2023cv23963
Plaintiff:
Lisette Yaques and Jose Victorero
Defendant:
Zhenzhen Lin, Unknown Co-Conspirators, Bank of America, NA, and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cochran v. W6LS, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00850
Plaintiff:
Ashley Cochran
Defendant:
W6LS, Inc. d/b/a WithU Loans, Caliber Financial Services, Inc,, Clarity Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Oehlwein v. LJP Consulting LLC et al
as 8:2022cv02285
Plaintiff:
Daniel Oehlwein
Defendant:
LJP Consulting LLC, Alonzo Primus, Bret Allen Crandall and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Aboltin v. Jeunesse LLC et al
as 6:2017cv01624
Defendant:
Jeunesse LLC, Kim Hui, Wendy R. Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
James J Aboltin, James J. Aboltin and Pamela J. Knight
Amicus Curiae:
Truth in Advertising, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Helen Xiong
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Steinberg et al v. Wings Communications, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv02090
Plaintiff:
Murray L. Steinberg, Barbara F. Steinberg, George R. Colby and others
Defendant:
Wings Communications, Inc., F. Douglas Wilhite, Sherry L. Wilhite and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kidwell v. Charlotte County School Board et al
as 2:2007cv00013
Plaintiff:
Billy R. Kidwell and Billy Kidwell
Defendant:
Charlotte County School Board, Charlotte County School Board, Dave Gayler and others
Mediator:
Cary R. Singletary
Movant:
Tana Kidwell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rogers, et al v. Nacchio, et al
as 0:2005cv60667
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets. Inc., Unknown Officers and Directors of Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Joseph P. Nacchio and others
Plaintiff:
William M. Rogers and C. Mylett
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
