Cases 41 - 50 of 199
Dietz v. Aztec Plumbing Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00716
Plaintiff:
Gary Dietz
Defendant:
Aztec Plumbing Inc. and Stephen Taub
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
White v. Davis
as 1:2016cv23713
Plaintiff:
Panceta C White
Defendant:
Stephen Carr Davis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
KOCHAKIAN v. P.G. SECURITY
as 0:2016cv62014
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN KOCHAKIAN
Defendant:
P.G. Security
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Morrison v. Top Cut Lawn Services, Inc. et al
as 9:2016cv81322
Plaintiff:
Linh Morrison
Defendant:
Top Cut Lawn Services, Inc. and Stephen H. Miller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Fields, et al v. Diamond Resorts International, Inc, et al
as 6:2016cv01285
Plaintiff:
Fields, Robert Stone, Justin Allis and others
Defendant:
Diamond Resorts International, Inc, Diamond Resorts International, Inc., Diamond Resorts International Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stephens v. Mastec, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00412
Plaintiff:
James Stephens
Defendant:
Mastec, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Freedman v. Stephens Foods, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00331
Plaintiff:
Dennis Fredman
Defendant:
Stephens Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bock et al v. Palmer Financial Consultant Inc et al
as 9:2016cv80687
Plaintiff:
Mark Bock , James Lucas Oliveira-Freitas and Derek Jason Bridges
Defendant:
Palmer Financial Consultant Inc, Stephen Palmer, Larry Diodato and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
SUTHERLAND v. HARBOUR RESTAURANT PARTNERS, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv21400
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH SUTHERLAND
Defendant:
HARBOUR RESTAURANT PARTNERS, LLC, STARR RESTAURANT ORGANIZATION, LP, STARR RESTAURANT ORGANIZATION GP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Rhodes v. Ever-Green Express Service, Inc.
as 8:2016cv00895
Plaintiff:
Stephen Rhodes
Defendant:
Ever-Green Express Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
