Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Beck et al v. Driveline Retail Merchandising, Inc.
as 3:2023cv03282
Plaintiff:
Kiersten Beck, Christine Lynn Barrett-Bukowski, Bridgette Boyd and others
Defendant:
Driveline Retail Merchandising, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones et al v. DMC Logistics, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv07321
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jones and Terrance Stokes
Defendant:
DMC Logistics, LLC and Airelle D. McNeal
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jones v. Miss Kitty's, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01327
Plaintiff:
Isis Jones
Defendant:
Miss Kitty's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones v. The Federal Savings Bank et al
as 1:2023cv01996
Plaintiff:
Monika Jones
Defendant:
The Federal Savings Bank and John T Calk
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hartwell v. Jones
as 1:2022cv03391
Plaintiff:
Nora Iliana Hartwell
Defendant:
Montel A Jones
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Capesius et al v. City of Evanston, Illinois
as 1:2022cv01754
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Capesius, Richard T Clucas, Jr., Joseph Des Jardins and others
Defendant:
City of Evanston, Illinois and City Of Evanston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones v. Medical Advantage Group
as 1:2020cv07128
Defendant:
Medical Advantage Group
Plaintiff:
Karen Jones
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jones v. Dakkota Integrated Systems
as 1:2020cv01730
Plaintiff:
Katishia Jones
Defendant:
Dakkota Integrated Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03006
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Varble v. Midwest Water and Concrete, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00247
Defendant:
Midwest Water & Concrete, Inc., Karen Jones and William S Jones
Plaintiff:
travis varble
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
