Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 11 - 20 of 127
The Regents of the University of California v. Trustmark Health Benefits, Inc. et al.
as 1:2023cv03358
Plaintiff: The Regents of the University of California, on behalf of the University of California, Irvine Medical Center and The Regents of the University of California
Defendant: Trustmark Health Benefits, Inc. f/k/a Coresoure, Inc., Piedmont Airlines, Inc., Does 1 through 25, Inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Doe
as 1:2023cv02294
Plaintiff: Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Charles A. Whobrey
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Health and Welfare and Pension Fund et al v. Doe
as 1:2023cv01870
Plaintiff: Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Health and Welfare and Pension Fund and Charles A. Whobrey
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Doe
as 1:2023cv00573
Plaintiff: Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Charles A. Whobrey
Defendant: John Doe, Clifford L Kauffman & Cherry L Kauffman Joint Revocable Trust u/a/d October 12, 2001, Cherry Lynn O'Donnell and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Riskus v. United Employee Benefit Fund et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00060
Plaintiff: George Riskus
Defendant: United Employee Benefit Fund, Herbert O. McDowell III and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Doe
as 1:2022cv07132
Plaintiff: Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Charles A. Whobrey
Defendant: John Doe and Gregory Sledzinski
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
John Muir Health v. Health Care Service Corporation, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv06963
Plaintiff: John Muir Health, a California not-for-profit healthcare corporation and John Muir Health
Defendant: Health Care Service Corporation, a Mutual Legal Reserve Co. d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, Health Care Service Corporation a Mutual Legal Reserve Co. doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas and Does 1 through 25, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Dignity Health v. Health Care Service Corporation
as 1:2022cv06969
Plaintiff: DIGNITY HEALTH, a California not-for-profit healthcare corporation and Dignity Health a California not-for-profit healthcare corporation doing business as Sierra Nevada Memorial Hospital doing business as Mercy San Juan Medical Center doing business as Mark Twain Medical Center San Andreas doing business as Saint Franci
Defendant: HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION, a Mutual Legal Reserve Co. d.b.a. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF TEXAS, Health Care Service Corporation a Mutual Legal Reserve Co doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Doe
as 1:2022cv05531
Plaintiff: Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Charles A. Whobrey
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Central States Southeast And Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Doe
as 1:2022cv05212
Plaintiff: Central States Southeast And Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Charles A. Whobrey
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?