Cases 141 - 150 of 794
Indivior et al v. Actavis Laboratories UT
as 2:2017cv01034
Plaintiff:
Indivior and Indivior UK Limited
Defendant:
Actavis Laboratories UT
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Ewert v. Netpulse et al
as 2:2017cv00995
Plaintiff:
Bruce M Ewert
Defendant:
Netpulse, Johnson Health Tech North America, Life Fitness and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Polar Electro Oy v. Suunto Oy et al
as 1:2017cv00139
Plaintiff:
Polar Electro Oy
Defendant:
Suunto Oy, Amer Sports Winter & Outdoor and Firstbeat Technologies Oy
Counter_claimant:
Amer Sports Winter & Outdoor
Counter_defendant:
Polar Electro Oy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
nCap Licensing et al v. Apple
as 2:2017cv00905
Plaintiff:
nCap Medical, nCap Telecommunications and nCap Licensing
Defendant:
Apple
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
ARSUS v. Firmage
as 1:2017cv00125
Plaintiff:
ARSUS
Defendant:
John H. Firmage
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Loops et al v. Bob Barker Company
as 1:2017cv00123
Plaintiff:
Loops and Loops Flexbrush
Defendant:
Bob Barker Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
EK Ekcessories v. Wolf Peak International
as 1:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
EK Ekcessories
Defendant:
Wolf Peak International
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Hand Held Products et al v. Code Corporation, The
as 2:2017cv00820
Plaintiff:
Hand Held Products , Intermec Technologies and Intermec IP
Defendant:
Code Corporation, The
Counter_claimant:
Code Corporation, The
Counter_defendant:
Hand Held Products , Intermec IP and Intermec Technologies
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
CR Bard et al v. Medical Components
as 2:2017cv00754
Plaintiff:
CR Bard , Bard Peripheral Vascular and Bard Access Systems
Defendant:
Medical Components
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0145
Fatboy The Original BV et al v. Chapman
as 2:2017cv00738
Plaintiff:
Fatboy The Original BV and Fatboy USA
Defendant:
Trevor Chapman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
