Patent Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Ningbo Tuoluhze Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. v. The Individuals, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv02120
Plaintiff: XYZ CORPORATION and Ningbo Tuoluhze Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. doing business as Tooenjoy
Defendant: The Individuals, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Caphont US, CNDOLD and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Shenzhen Kunshengze Elec-tronic Commerce Co., Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations dentified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv16234
Plaintiff: Shenzhen Kunshengze Elec-tronic Commerce Co., Ltd.
Defendant: THE PARTNERSHIPS and UNIN-CORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE "A", The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations dentified on Schedule A, LANXI LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Ningbo Ningshing Ubay Supply Chain Co. LTD v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv15775
Plaintiff: John Doe and Ningbo Ningshing Ubay Supply Chain Co. Ltd.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, YOCONYO, Best discount furniture and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv14651
Plaintiff: Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Ucgoim, Letakle and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Oakley, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv05034
Plaintiff: Oakley, Inc.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, cngreenshine.en.alibaba.com, Gaomi Best Crafts Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Dyson Technology Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv04401
Plaintiff: Dyson Technology Limited
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Bonacell Store, Bonadget Store and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Steel City Enterprises Inc. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on the Attached Schedule A
as 1:2023cv02037
Plaintiff: Steel City Enterprises Inc.
Defendant: The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on the Attached Schedule A, changlan5, Emmybroad and others
Debtor In Possession: Yiruolin Technologies Co Ltd
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Dyson Technology Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv01948
Plaintiff: Dyson Technology Limited
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Chengfu department store helmet store, Hodrons and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Dyson Technology Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv00801
Plaintiff: Dyson Technology Limited
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Super Jewelry Clothes Shoe Shop, LBVGY and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
LG Electronics Inc. v Partnerships and unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02600
Plaintiff: Partnerships and unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A, LG Electronics Inc. and LG Electronics Alabama, Inc.
Defendant: GLACIERFRESH, PUREPLUS, ICEPURE Store and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?