Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rovi Guides, Inc. v. Comcast Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv09826
Plaintiff:
Rovi Guides, Inc.
Defendant:
Comcast Corporation, Comcast of Houston, LLC, Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC and others
Intervenor:
Comcast STB Software I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Rovi Guides, Inc. et al v. Comcast Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv09278
Plaintiff:
Rovi Guides, Inc. , Rovi Technologies Corp. and Veveo, Inc.
Defendant:
Comcast Corporation , Comcast Cable Communications, LLC , Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC and others
Intervenor:
Comcast STB Software I, LLC
Mediator:
David Folsom
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
British Telecommunications Plc et al v. Haier America Trading, LLC et al
as 7:2009cv07114
Plaintiff:
British Telecommunications Plc, CIF Licensing, LLC, GE Technology Development, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Haier America Trading, LLC, Haier Group, Co. and Haim LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
CIF Licensing, L.L.C. et al v. Lenovo Group Limited et al
as 7:2009cv01849
Plaintiff:
CIF Licensing, L.L.C. , GE Technology Development, Inc. , LG Electronics, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Lenovo Group Limited and Lenovo (United States) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. et al v. EMI Group PLC et al
as 7:2008cv07351
Plaintiff:
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. and others
Defendant:
EMI Group PLC, EMI Music, Inc., H&R Block Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. et al v. EMI Group PLC et al
as 1:2008cv07351
Plaintiff:
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. and others
Defendant:
EMI Group PLC, EMI Music, Inc., H&R Block Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation et al v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.
as 1:2007cv11614
Plaintiff:
Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation, Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation, Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation and others
Defendant:
Barr Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Enzo Biochem, Inc., et al v. Amersham PLC, et al
as 1:2002cv08448
Plaintiff:
Enzo Biochem, Inc. and Enzo Life Sciences, Inc.
Defendant:
Amersham PLC , Amersham Biosciences , Perkinelmer, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Molecular Probes, Inc. , Amersham PLC , Amersham Biosciences and others
Counter_defendant:
Enzo Biochem, Inc. , Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. , Amersham PLC and others
Cross_claimant:
Orchid Biosciences, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Perkinelmer, Inc. and Perkinelmer Life Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
