Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. Lofty Trading, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10943
Counter Defendant:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Defendant:
Lofty Trading, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Ben Chang Fan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
What Do You Meme, LLC v. Intelligent Change, LLC
as 1:2022cv05065
Plaintiff:
What Do You Meme, LLC
Defendant:
Intelligent Change, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Citizen One, Inc. et al v. GBG Sean John LLC
as 1:2021cv01199
Plaintiff:
CE Trademark, LLC and Citizen One, Inc. doing business as Citizen Change
Defendant:
GBG Sean John LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Mattel, Inc. v. 1994_Honeymoon, et al
as 1:2018cv10427
Defendant:
TIANTIANS, TINGTINGGUAIGUAI, NONGNONG and others
Plaintiff:
ABC and Mattel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Half The Sky Foundation v. Half The Sky Movement, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv04929
Plaintiff:
Half The Sky Foundation
Defendant:
Half The Sky Movement, LLC, Show Of Force, LLC, Force Film Foundation, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Hellman-Chang, LLC v. Brownstone, Inc.
as 1:2011cv06980
Plaintiff:
Hellman-Chang, LLC
Defendant:
Brownstone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Cathay Source USA, Inc. v. Hang Tak Fat Trading Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv04663
Defendant:
Allied Imports, Inc., Blue Star Equities, Inc., Chang Fa Food Market, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cathay Source USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04315
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harstell Corp. v. Haeri Lee's Nail Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv03105
Plaintiff:
Harstell Corp.
Defendant:
Haeri Lee's Nail Corp., C. Lee, Haeri Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
