Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Abbott et al v. Strongblock et al
as 1:2023cv04207
Plaintiff:
Brian Abbott, Chrystel Bassett-Simmonds, Eric Bell and others
Defendant:
Strongblock, David C Moss, Brian Abramson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Wang v. Jounce Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03267
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Jounce Therapeutics, Inc., Jigar Raythatha, Luis A. Diaz, Jr. and others
O'Dell v. Jounce Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03168
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Jounce Therapeutics, Inc., Jigar Raythatha, Luis A. Diaz, Jr. and others
Elliot v. Jounce Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03093
Plaintiff:
David Elliot
Defendant:
Jounce Therapeutics, Inc., Richard Murray, Jigar Raythatha and others
Diamond v. Jounce Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03053
Plaintiff:
Robert Diamond
Defendant:
Jounce Therapeutics, Inc., Jigar Raythatha, Luis A. Diaz, Jr. and others
Wong v. Jounce Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03044
Plaintiff:
Masie Wong
Defendant:
Jounce Therapeutics, Inc., Jigar Raythatha, Luis A. Diaz, Jr. and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. DeFrancesco et al
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Andrew DeFrancesco, Marlio Mauricio Diaz Cardona, Carlos Felipe Rezk and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
MacAyeal v. Medley Management Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10907
Plaintiff:
James R. MacAyeal
Defendant:
Medley Management Inc., Medley Group LLC, Brook Taube and others
Abuda et al v. Strongblock et al
as 1:2022cv10869
Plaintiff:
Eileen Advincula, Chukwuemeka Agiri, Daley Antoine and others
Defendant:
David C Moss, Brian Abramson, Corey J Lederer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Diaz v. The Gap, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07371
Plaintiff:
Joshua Diaz
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc., Sonia Syngal and Katrina OConnell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
