Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Taylor v. Axonics, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Steve Taylor
Defendant:
Axonics, Inc., Michael H. Carrel, Raymond W. Cohen and others
Smith v. Axonics, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
Axonics, Inc., Michael H. Carrel, Raymond W. Cohen and others
Thompson v. Hawaiian Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
Defendant:
Hawaiian Holdings, Inc., Lawrence S. Hershfield, Peter R. Ingram and others
Harris v. Hawaiian Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Tracy Harris
Defendant:
Hawaiian Holdings, Inc., Lawrence S. Hershfield, Peter R. Ingram and others
Meek v. Hawaiian Holdings, Inc., et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Bryan Meek and Monteverde & Associates PC
Defendant:
Hawaiian Holdings, Inc., Peter R. Ingram, Lawrence S. Hershfield and others
Owen v. Hawaiian Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
DeAnn Owen
Defendant:
Hawaiian Holdings, Inc., Lawrence S. Hershfield, Peter R. Ingram and others
FTC v. Elegant Solutions, Inc., et al
as 23-55117
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant:
ELEGANT SOLUTIONS, INC., a corporation, DBA Federal Direct Group, TREND CAPITAL LTD., a corporation, DBA Mission Hill Federal, DARK ISLAND INDUSTRIES, INC., a corporation, FKA Cosmoplitan Funding, Inc., DBA Federal Direct Group and others
Receiver:
THOMAS W. MCNAMARA
Dixon v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01339
Plaintiff:
Brian Dixon
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle B. Peterson and others
Coffman v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08622
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle B. Peterson and others
Lifshitz v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08564
Plaintiff:
Phil Lifshitz
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle B. Peterson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
