Securities/Commodities/Exchanges Cases filed in New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Strougo v. Beazer Homes USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05301
Defendant: Beazer Homes USA, Inc., Allan P. Merrill and Robert L. Salomon
Plaintiff: Robert Strougo
Yanli Lin v. Puda Coal, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv05259
Plaintiff: Yanli Lin
Defendant: Puda Coal, Inc. , Ming Zhao, Liping Zhu and others
Movant: Salomon Querub , Howard Pritchard , Hotel Ventures LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Melgen et al v. Citigroup Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv04788
Plaintiff: Salomon Melgen , Flor Melgen and SFM Holdings Limited Partnership
Defendant: Citigroup Inc., Charles Prince, Vikram Pandit and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Abesour et al v. Milter et al
as 1:2010cv04767
Plaintiff: Salomon Abesour , Samuel Abensour , Milka Lovas and others
Defendant: S. George Milter, Cliffe R. Bodden and Lempert Capital Management, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Fox v. Salomon Levis
as 1:2007cv03252
Plaintiff: Robert I. Fox
Defendant: Salomon Levis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
In Re: Doral Financial Corp. Securities Litigation Featured Case
as 1:2005md01706
In Re: Doral Financial Corp. Securities Litigation
Plaintiff: James Finn, Harold Faverman, John D. Burgener and others
Petitioner: Argent Funds, Doral Investor Group, Institutional Investor Group and others
Defendant: Doral Financial Corporation, Salomon Levis, Richard F. Bonini and others
Not Classified By Court: Robert I. Fox
Interested Party: Todd Augenbaum
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Faverman et al v. Doral Financial Corp. et al
as 1:2005cv04026
Plaintiff: Harold Faverman, John D. Burgener, International Union of Operating Engineers Local 825 Pension Fund and others
Petitioner: James Finn, Doral Investor Group and Argent Funds
Defendant: Doral Financial Corp., Salomon Levis, Zola Levis and others
Not Yet Classified: Anthony J. Tesoro, as Trustee for the Anthony J. Tesoro Family Trust dtd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
IN RE American International Group, Inc Securities Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2004cv08141
Lead Plaintiff: Ohio Public Employees Retirement System, Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico, State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio and others
Plaintiff: Michael Feder and Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi
Consolidated Plaintiff: Jerome Noll, Stephan Frank, Joseph Scuilla and others
Appellant: Alan Rothstein, Marisa Rothstein, Mollye Rothstein and others
Petitioner: THE STATE TREASURER OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, CUSTODIAN OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, MICHIGAN STATE POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, AN, Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, The Reynolds Group and others
Defendant: American International Group, Inc., Maurice Greenberg, Howard Smith and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: State of New York Attorney General Office and Marshall Orloff
Not Classified By Court: Margaret B. Amidei, KAREN J MICHAELS, Lee Janovits and others
Interested Party: Arkansas Public Employees Retirement System
Amicus Curiae: North American Securties Administrators Association, Inc.
Intervenor: Jacksonville Police & Fire Pension Fund and James Connolly
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
W.R. Huff Asset v. Deloitte & Touche, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2003cv05752
Plaintiff: W.R. Huff Asset Management, Co., LLC.
Defendant: Deloitte & Touche , Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. , Credit Suisse, New York Branch and others
Movant: Ainsworth E. Morris
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Carrier1 Int'l. IPO, et al v. Carrier1 Int'l. S.A., et al
as 1:2001cv10940
Plaintiff: Linc Corp., John Ashoo, Howard Borus and others
Defendant: Carrier1 International S.A., Stig Johansson, Joachim W. Bauer and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?