Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lomas v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv03400
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul, SSA Noticing and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Jessica C. Lomas
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Avery v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv00769
Plaintiff:
Jessica Kay Avery
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Collins v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv00355
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Jessica Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gonzales v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv01982
Plaintiff:
Jessica R. Gonzales
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Apodaca v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv02804
Plaintiff:
Jessica Cathleen Apodaca
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Parsons Lack v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv02107
Plaintiff:
Jessica Parsons Lack
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gonzales v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00543
Plaintiff:
Jessica R. Gonzales
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Baysinger v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv02628
Plaintiff:
Jessica N. Baysinger
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gonzales v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv00205
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Jessica R. Gonzales
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rodriguez v. Astrue
as 1:2007cv00906
Plaintiff:
Jessica Rodriguez
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
