Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Roybal v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Roybal
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Brighton v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv01385
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Brighton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Grandusky v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2017cv01205
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Grandusky
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Wooton v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv02852
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D Wooton
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sluis v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00753
Plaintiff:
Kimberly E Sluis
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Herman v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv02675
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Herman
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Baumgartner v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv01300
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Baumgartner
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Mathis v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00893
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Mathis
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ploughe v. Colvin et al
as 1:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ploughe
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Zikmund v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv02147
Plaintiff:
Kimberly S. Zikmund
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
