Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Fry III v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv01627
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Kristin Pulatie, Joseph B. Gaffney and others
Plaintiff:
Edmund Joseph Fry III and Edmund Joseph John Fry, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Manzanares v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv02794
Plaintiff:
Cynthia B. Manzanares
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jahnke v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv02947
Plaintiff:
Jason B. Jahnke
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hagelin v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv01545
Plaintiff:
Mark B. Hagelin
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Berumen v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv02591
Plaintiff:
Magdeline B. Berumen
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Klimek v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv01166
Plaintiff:
Marion B. Klimek
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dias v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv01435
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Dias
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Medina v. Astrue
as 1:2008cv01501
Plaintiff:
Kimberly B. Medina
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Aguilar v. Astrue
as 1:2008cv01440
Plaintiff:
Maria B. Aguilar
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Leventhal v. Astrue
as 1:2008cv01421
Plaintiff:
Howard B. Leventhal
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
