Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Rice v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2023cv02639
Plaintiff:
Addison Mark Jason Rice, Sr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Frey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00825
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Frey, Sr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chavers v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2022cv81234
Plaintiff:
Elvis Chavers, Sr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MCIRVIN v KIJAKAZI
as 4:2021cv00459
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LAMAR MCIRVIN and KENNETH LAMAR MCIRVIN, SR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Dixon, Sr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv01232
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Dixon, Sr.
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shell v. Saul
as 0:2020cv62527
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Carl Shell, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Smith, Sr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv02683
Plaintiff:
Aaron Smith, Sr.
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gain, Sr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv00680
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kent W. Gain, Sr.
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Chavers v. Commissioner of Social Secuirty
as 9:2019cv81136
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuirty
Plaintiff:
Elvis Chavers, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Amely, Sr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2019cv01650
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Edward Amely, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
