Cases 111 - 120 of 166
UNITED AMERICAN HOUSING & EDUCATION FOUNDATION v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv01340
Plaintiff:
UNITED AMERICAN HOUSING & EDUCATION FOUNDATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7428 IRS: Declaratory Judgment
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ACKERMAN
as 1:2009cv01172
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PETER ACKERMAN
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MORTEN
as 1:2009cv01018
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MARLENE MORTEN
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
BENNETT-BEY v. SHULMAN
as 1:2009cv00963
Plaintiff:
FLOYD BENNETT-BEY
Defendant:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
BORITZ v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2009cv00542
Plaintiff:
PETER BORITZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 Civil Actions by Taxpayers for Refund of Taxes
SOUTHERN FAITH MINISTRIES, INC. v. GEITHNER et al
as 1:2009cv00515
Plaintiff:
SOUTHERN FAITH MINISTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER and DOUGLAS SHULMAN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
LAUKUS v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2009cv00475
Plaintiff:
KYLE W. LAUKUS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
KEOHANE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv02081
Plaintiff:
PAUL KEOHANE, PAUL KEOHANE, PAUL KEOHANE and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CLARK v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2008cv02047
Plaintiff:
JACK CLARK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and DENNIS STIFFLER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANACOSTIA BIBLE CHURCH
as 1:2008cv01676
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANACOSTIA BIBLE CHURCH
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
