Cases 101 - 110 of 1,843
In Re: Motion to Quash Subpoenas Directed to Greenberg Traurig, LLP, and Keith Jarosik
as 1:2023mc00265
Petitioner:
Chervon (HK) Limited, Chervon North America Inc., Greenberg Traurig, LLP and others
Respondent:
One World Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd. and Homelite Consumer Products, Inc.
In Re: Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer Privacy Litigation
as 1:2012md02358
In Re:
Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer Privacy Litigation
Defendant:
Google LLC
Petitioner:
Prescott Lovern
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk Jeffery N. Luthi, Matthew Soble, Lourdes Villegas and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Small v. Fidelity Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00706
Plaintiff:
William Small
Defendant:
Fidelity Inc., John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In Re: Request from Argentina
as 1:2023cv00680
Petitioner:
The United States of America
Respondent:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In Re: Request from Argentina
as 1:2023cv00679
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
United States of America v. Tunnell
as 1:2023cv00643
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Maurice Tunnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
In Re: Letter of Request from Poland
as 1:2023cv00676
Petitioner:
The United States
Respondent:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In Re: Request from Vienna
as 1:2023mc00258
Petitioner:
Amgen, Inc.
Respondent:
Sandoz, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In Re: Request from South Korea
as 1:2023mc00248
Petitioner:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Respondent:
Biogen Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
