Cases 11 - 20 of 14,108
Connor v. 606 W. Aldine Condo Assn. et al
as 1:2024cv02876
Plaintiff:
Latara Connor
Defendant:
Company, Inc. G&V Construction, City of Chicago 606 W. Aldine Condo Assn., Paving, LLC d/b/a Cardi Asphalt AGPD and others
Cross Plaintiff:
G&V Construction Company, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Alfred Benesch & Comp Any doing business as Benesch, ABC Engineering of NY P.C. doing business as Benesch Engineering and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
DISH Network L.L.C. et al v. Shah et al
as 1:2024cv04745
Plaintiff:
DISH Network L.L.C. and Sling TV, LLC
Defendant:
Maulik Shah and Manc Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Gunn v. Olaniyan et al
as 1:2024cv04657
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gunn
Defendant:
Olatokunbo Olaniyan, Estel Garcia, Elizabeth Geddes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Air Transport Association of America, Inc. v. Meyer
as 1:2024cv04623
Plaintiff:
Air Transport Association of America, Inc. d/b/a Airlines for America
Defendant:
Kenneth J. Meyer
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
HERRERA MORA et al v. Alexis Dimas Guzman
as 1:2024cv04578
Plaintiff:
DULCE MARIA HERRERA MORA
Defendant:
ALEXIS DIMAS GUZMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Taylor v. Fay Servicing LLC
as 1:2024cv03032
Plaintiff:
Deandre Taylor
Defendant:
Fay Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Fitzpatrick et al v. Lens.com, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02700
Plaintiff:
Mary Agrella Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
Lens.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Mendenhall v. Xenial, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02640
Plaintiff:
Faith Mendenhall and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Faith Mendenhall
Defendant:
Xenial, Inc. and Global Payments Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
