Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Fares v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 8:2018cv01613
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Plaintiff:
Mazen Fares
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Hall v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. et al
as 8:2018cv01586
Plaintiff:
Sammie Hall
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC and Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Mason v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 1:2018cv22565
Plaintiff:
Richard Mason
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burke v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. et al
as 8:2018cv01507
Plaintiff:
Patricia Burke
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Rowland v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 3:2018cv00782
Plaintiff:
Paul Rowland
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Persaud v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 6:2018cv00747
Plaintiff:
Nankesure Persaud
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Krieger v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A
as 4:2018cv10041
Plaintiff:
Mitch Krieger
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McGowan v. Capital One Services, LLC
as 0:2018cv60747
Plaintiff:
Michael McGowan
Defendant:
Capital One Services, LLC and Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
as 8:2018cv00592
Plaintiff:
Joshua David
Defendant:
Capio Partners, LLC and Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Ross v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 6:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
Maurice Ross
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
