Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Gakuba v. Kurtz et al
as 3:2013cv50112
Plaintiff:
Peter Gakuba
Defendant:
Kate C. Kurtz, Winnebago County State's Attorney Office, Illinois("People or "State") and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gakuba v. O'Brien et al
as 1:2012cv07296
Plaintiff:
Peter Gakuba
Defendant:
Charles O'Brien, Michael Easton, Daniel Baisley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Doe v. AISS, Inc.
as 1:2012cv06348
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
AISS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Doe v. Doe
as 1:2011cv08702
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2518
Pawelczak v. National Asset Recovery, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02535
Plaintiff:
Anna Pawelczak
Defendant:
John and Jane Does Numbers 1 through 25 and National Asset Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Long v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 1:2011cv01308
Plaintiff:
Tammy Jo Long
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, The Bank of New York Mellon, Shuping, Morse & Ross, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Doe et al v. Doe et al
as 1:2011cv00113
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe , Julie Doe and John Doe
Defendant:
A Doe , B Doe, Ann Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2518
Dabrowski v. Pentagroup Financial, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00853
Plaintiff:
Karina Dabrowski
Defendant:
Pentagroup Financial, LLC and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Decker et al v. American Recovery Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00460
Plaintiff:
Maude Decker and Michael Simmons
Defendant:
American Recovery Systems, Inc. and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Koby et al v. Leading Edge Recovery Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv06990
Plaintiff:
April Yarborough Koby, Michael P. Koby and Michael Simmons
Defendant:
Leading Edge Recovery Solutions, LLC and John and Jane Does Numbers 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
