Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Hill v. Benefits Committee RR Donnelley and Sons Company et al
as 2:2009cv02220
Plaintiff:
David C Hill
Defendant:
Benefits Committee RR Donnelley and Sons Company and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Hill et al v. Sentry Credit, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00328
Plaintiff:
Michael Hill and Danielle Hill
Defendant:
Sentry Credit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
International Fidelity Insurance, Company v. Apex Capital LP et al
as 1:2008cv03593
Plaintiff:
International Fidelity Insurance, Company
Defendant:
Apex Capital LP, CJM Factors, LLC, D&S Factors, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Foster v. Hill et al
as 1:2008cv01164
Plaintiff:
James Hall Foster
Defendant:
Kirk L Hill
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Foster v. Hill et al
as 1:2007cv06939
Plaintiff:
James Hall Foster
Defendant:
Kirk L Hill and Kirk L Hill
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Hill v. Capital Recovery Services, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv05483
Plaintiff:
Carol A. Hill and Carol A. Hill
Defendant:
Capital Recovery Services, LLC, Law Offices of Luis E. Vasquez, Shekinah, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Robin Hill Development Company v. Windsor Capital Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv04058
Plaintiff:
Robin Hill Development Company
Defendant:
Windsor Capital Mortgage Corporation, Windsor Capital Mortgage Corporation and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hill v. Stewart & Associates, P.C. et al
as 1:2007cv03369
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Hill, Matthew D. Hill and Matthew D. Hill
Defendant:
Stewart & Associates, P.C. and Credigy Receivables, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
