Cases 31 - 40 of 145
Hoke v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 8:2018cv01109
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hoke
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Ramcharitar et al v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 0:2018cv60878
Plaintiff:
Karla Ramcharitar and Richard Ramcharitar
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boue v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 1:2018cv21352
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Plaintiff:
Janet Boue
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HALL v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC
as 4:2018cv00112
Plaintiff:
ROSA HALL
Defendant:
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chapman v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 8:2018cv00203
Plaintiff:
James Chapman
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Williams v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 6:2017cv02064
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Williams
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Hynes v. Capital One Bank (USA) National Association et al
as 8:2017cv02176
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Hynes
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) National Association and Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
ANDREWS v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES,LLC
as 3:2017cv00499
Plaintiff:
PAUL ANDREWS
Defendant:
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Royal v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 8:2017cv01734
Plaintiff:
Mary Royal
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Schnitzler v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC et al
as 8:2017cv01474
Plaintiff:
H Edward Schnitzler, Jr.
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC and Hayt, Hayt & Landau PL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
